Tag Archives: oil

Deloitte: Shale gas, oil potential increasingly apparent

Oil and gas production from tight shale formations clearly is a long-term phenomenon and not a short-term trend, Deloitte LLP officials told reporters. The financial services company found growing confidence in unconventional energy resources in a survey it conducted last year, said John England, a vice-chairman and leader of its oil and gas practice.

“Huge investments are flowing into this sector from previously unheard from sources,” he said on May 21 during Deloitte’s 2013 Washington Energy Conference at nearby National Harbor, Md. “It’s a reason so many foreign companies have come into the US. Investment recently has flowed to midstream infrastructure, but there’s still strong interest upstream.”

More natural gas liquids are being recovered along with the shale gas, and that’s attracting investments too, he observed. “It’s interesting that we’re having this debate about authorizing more [LNG] exports when we’re already export significant amounts of NGLs,” England said.

Growing tight oil development also is generating more investments, he continued. “Even in the Eagle Ford and Bakken formations, recovery rates are still quite low so there’s a real technology opportunity,” he said.

Joseph A. Stanislaw, Deloitte’s independent senior energy and sustainability advisor, said the whole global energy equation is changing because of what North America is doing with shales. “This new fossil energy abundance could benefit alternatives if we use it not as an end, but a means,” he suggested. Read more…

EU Seeks Energy Integration as U.S. Shale Gas Widens Price Gap

(Source: Blomberg) According to a commission report prepared for a summit of EU leaders, shale gas production has contributed to a widening gap between U.S. and EU industrial prices for energy. The increase in European energy prices is linked to the inconsistency of EU policies to boost the share of renewable energy, increase energy efficiency and cut greenhouse gases, as well as to national policies that distort the internal market, according to a study.

Bloomberg: “EU Seeks Energy Integration as U.S. Shale Gas Widens Price Gap”

Canada’s natural gas industry could be worth $1 trillion

The Conference Board of Canada published an analysis Monday that expects Canada’s natural gas industry to add more than $1 trillion to Canada’s economy over the next 24 years and support an average of 260,000 jobs a year over that time frame.  At HRN we completely agree!

The ambitious projection factors in all the direct investment, but also ancillary spinoffs down the supply chain and figures all regions of the country stand to benefit, even those provinces without any large natural gas holdings.

Read more: Canada’s natural gas industry could be worth $1 trillion

Is the shale gas “miracle” over-hyped?

In his upcoming book ““Cold, Hungry and in the Dark: Exploding the Natural Gas Supply Myth.”, Bill Powers argues that the shale gas miracle is over-hyped and will disappoint. Mr. Powers believes that shale gas will only last 10 years, and not the 100 years that many predict.

Certainly, in the recent presidential campaign both President Barack Obama, and Governor Mitt Romney both pointed to shale gas as a major contributor to America’s energy independence. But if there are only 10 years of shale gas in the ground the contribution of shale gas to this objective would be short-lived. Who’s right?

Everyone has their own “best estimates” all from expert opinions based on years of research and study. And Mr. Powers is one of many professional opinions. Certainly the shale gas boom in the USA, and Canada has brought on a massive new energy supply source that has fundamentally changed the North American and global energy markets. And the shale gas story will not end with the U.S. as new shale gas basins are discovered, developed and put into production around the world with major geopolitical impact.

But this is not about this story, the focus is the USA (North American) energy market, and whether the shale gas reserves will provide 10 or 100 years of energy.

The US Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) estimates that there are 2,203 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas that is “technically recoverable” in the United States. At the rate of US natural gas consumption in 2011 of about 24 Tcf per year, 2,203 Tcf of natural gas is enough to last about 92 years.

However, given human nature and fundamentals to migrate to the lowest cost, as long as natural gas remains at current low levels, consumption is likely to increase as more power plants, trucks, cars, etc convert to natural gas. And during this same time of increasing demand we would likely see increases in natural gas prices which over time would temper demand. It is challenging to see how Mr. Powers gets from the EIA’s 92 year estimate to less then 10 years.  His theory is primarily based on stating that the data used by EIA and others is fundamentally flawed by over estimating the production life of shale gas wells. In other words, production drops off sooner and faster then most predict.

(The EIA states: “Technically recoverable reserves consist of “proved reserves” and “unproved resources.” Proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas are the estimated volumes expected to be produced, with reasonable certainty, under existing economic and operating conditions. Unproved resources are additional volumes estimated to be technically recoverable without consideration of economics or operating conditions, based on the application of current technology.”)

The key question here is what is the production life cycle of a shale gas well? It has always been know that this cycle is relatively short and dramatic compared to the longer production life of a traditional gas well. These life cycles differ between basins, whereby one basin may average longer production then another. It is not uncommon to see a production drop-off of 50% in the first 12 months of production in many wells. Numbers vary between basins and between wells.

Perhaps the EIA is wrong in their 92 year estimate, though their access to data seems to be quite extensive. There certainly are some variables including their usage of 2011 natural gas consumption rates their calculation and not predicting any increasing consumption rate over time. Either from economic growth, or increaseed usage of natural gas as part of the overall energy mix. Based on this alone one could resonable estimate that 92 years is not one hundred percent accurate. But with that said, predictions are never one hundred percent accurate and for this reason alone we know Mr. Powers calculations are likely off.

So if we took all the scientific calculations, and included Mr. Powers predictions we would like find a life span for shale gas between sixty and seventy years – about one generations worth of energy. Only time will tell who is right.

You can read a complete interview with Mr. Powers on the Energy Report: US Shale Gas Won’t Last 10 years

Forbes: In Obama’s Second Term, Shale Gas Production Not Likely to Slow Down

Shale gas a game changer for U.S. energy economy

A few years ago, when shale gas started to take off we wrote a series of articles that predicted the far reaching economic and geopolitical impact of shale gas. Slowly but surely these predictions are coming coming to fruition and also entered into the presidential campaigns of both Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama.

Both candidates have stated that domestic shale gas, and domestic oil production are important to the US and must increase.Obama stated that both candidates agree on this point and adds that the U.S. must also explore alternative clean energy technologies and opportunities. Obama noted that domestic production of oil and gas was at a level higher than it had been in recent years, but Romney said it wasn’t due to Obama but instead in spite of his policies.Romney when on to state:

“Mr. President, all of the increase in natural gas and oil has happened on private land, not on government land. On government land, your administration has cut the number of permits and licenses in half. If I’m president, I’ll double them.”

Over the years the HRN opinion is clear and consistent. Its going to take all energy sources to make the U.S. energy independent. We agree that it will take increased production of oil, natural gas from shale, clean coal technologies, increased energy contributions from solar, wind, nuclear and others. We  lean towards natural gas as being the leading opportunity to represent a greater percentage of the overall energy mix while reducing CO2 footprint.

However, the energy needs of the U.S. are massive. From a political point of view, it does not make sense to open up and increase the production of shale gas if its simply to going to be exported to Asia. That defeats the purpose. The U.S needs to encourage the domestic consumption of natural gas not export its benefit to Asia.

This will become one of the many top issues for this presidential campaign. Both candidates should provide a balanced approach to the issue recognizing all energy sources as valued long term investments, while understanding that natural gas provides the best opportunity to bridge the gap to a clean energy future. Today, the U.S. needs to increase demestic production; leverage the domestic and environmental advantages of natural gas and invest in clean energy for the future.

Shale gas a game changer for U.S. energy economy [Richmond Times-Dispatch, Va.]

Natural Gas: North America’s Energy Future – or Just Hot Air?

The team over at Visual Capitalist have put together a really informative Infographic on natural gas titled “Natural Gas: North America’s Energy Future – or Just Hot Air?“. Overall the infographic is very good, however, they fall short on their comments in regards to the “fracking” process. In the infographic they paste a warning that states:

“Hydrolic fracking is very controversioal process with mounting environmental and and regulatory concerns. Environmental organizations have numerous concerns with air quality, water usage, and wastewater management, methan contamination, microseismic events, and the chemicals used in “fracking”.

Though such a statement is factual in that, yes, environmentals have voiced these concerns. That does not make the statements factual. There are independent experts that contradict these statements. So they become merely opinions with equally impressive professional / expert support.

The one thing that could have been mentioned is that technology improves constantly, and though some of these concerns may have been an issue five years ago they are no longer an issue today or have been de-risked considerably. For example, the solutions or “chemicals” used in the fracking process are now non-toxic and are 99.9% recoverable posing little risk in this part of the process (see Gas Frac Energy Services).

Unfortunately, the environmental arguements have not caught up to recent technology, and have become more political and less factual. There is always room for improvement, and the environmentals that oppose fracking should keep pace with technology so they can keep pressure on companies to always make improvements.

Nuclear power is still justifiable in cheap shale gas world

According to GE CEO Jeff Immelt the success of shale gas industry has produced a global adundance of cheap natural gas that has made nuclear power hard to junstify. He is quoted in a Financial Times interview as stating:

“They’re finding more gas all the time. It’s just hard to justify nuclear. Gas is so cheap and at some point, economics rule”.

Here on HRN we support the shale gas industry and its potential to represent a larger part of the overall energy mix in many countries. However, it will never fully displace any other energy source. The world will need all sources of power, to meet growing, sustainable long term demand.

A long term approach must be taken with nuclear power and not economics based on the spot price or projected price of natural gas. Nuclear power is needed, and should be employed with the world’s leading technologies, and built away from earth quake faults, and tsunami zones.

Human nature and price economics will dictate that consumers gravitate towards lowest cost supply. We are finally seeing the number of users of natural gas increasing as trillions of cubic meters of natural gas are unlocked from vast shale gas resources. Coal plants are converting to natural gas and large commercial vehicle fleets in the US are switching to the low carbon, affordability of natural gas vehicles.

There is great opportunity in natural gas globally. However it can not be the sole energy source and will not completely displace or replace other energy sources. No country should bet their future entirely on one energy source but using more natural gas produced from shale gas as a bridge to a more sustainable greener energy future makes more sense. Nuclear is part of that energy future but in order for it to succeed, new generation nuclear reactors need to be built in order to replace existing, aging reactors, and new ones for future demand. It will take visionary leadership, rather then immediate profit considerations and short sightedness that has become common place in deferring problems to future generations.

Reuters: “Nuclear power hard to justify in cheap gas world: GE

Statoil partners Canada’s PetroFrontier to explore shale gas in Australia

Norway’s Statoil (Reuters) has entered into partnership with Canada’s PetroFrontier Corp to explore for shale gas in Australia, it said on Wednesday.

Australia, the world’s fourth-largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG), could have enough shale gas resources to double its gas resource base, the government said in May.

Statoil will farm into four exploration permits and two exploration permit applications in the Southern Georgina basin, Northern Territory, the Calgary-headquartered PetroFrontier’s said in a separate statement.

This is the first footprint of the Nordic company in Australia, while Statoil has been betting big on unconventional gas resources in the United States, identified as one of its key growth areas.

“It’s a small, but significant step for Statoil in Australia. They can use their U.S. experience as a stepping stone for exploration,” said Trond Omdal, analyst at Arctic Securities.

The Norwegian company will have an option to earn up to 65 percent of PetroFrontier’s working interest in exchange for exploration related payments and carried costs of up to $210 million over three phases, PetroFrontier said.

Statoil declined to give any estimated for the potential reserves.

“This is an exploration activity into immature areas, and we don’t want to give any indications as it’s a high risk to turn it into commercial potential,” said Baard Glad Pedersen, Statoil’s spokesman for international upstream activities.

The shale gas resources, which are primarily in central Australia, are estimated at about 400 trillion cubic feet (11.3 trillion cubic meters), the country’s resorce ministry has said.

Statoil said the partners could drill 10-20 wells by 2017, with Statoil committing $25 million for the first phase of the exploration programme.

PetroFrontier will operate the first phase of the programme while Statoil has secured options to operate from the second exploration phase in addition to increase ownership interests from 25 to 65 percent of PetroFrontier’s interests.

Trapped in deep rock formations, shale oil is extracted using new technologies like hydraulic fracturing – or “fracking” – and directional drilling.

Exxon’s big bet on shale gas

America’s most profitable company – Exxon Mobil – now produces about as much natural gas as it does oil. CEO Rex Tillerson thinks the fracking party has just begun.

(Source: CNN Money) — For Rex Tillerson fracking is more than a revolutionary approach to drilling oil and gas — it’s part of his personal history. Simply mention the word to the CEO of Exxon Mobil (XOM) and he starts reminiscing about his days as a young engineer. It was 1976, and Tillerson had been sent to East Texas for his second assignment at the company. His job was to follow around rigs drilling for natural gas and “complete” the wells. That meant experimenting with a process known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. By pumping water, sand, and chemicals down into a well at high pressure, he could cause cracks in the stone where the gas was trapped and allow more of it to flow.

That winter Tillerson practically lived out of the back of his car, driving to the company’s district office in Tyler at night so he could run punch-card decks through the computer to design his new fracking programs. Out in the field, when the temperature dropped and the wind blew, the then 24-year-old engineer was grateful for the shelter provided by the big diesel engines that powered the water pumps. “I would stand between those big fracking tanks to stay warm, because the water’s heated,” says Tillerson in a rare interview, laughing at the memory. “I’d stay there until they were ready to crank those babies up, and then I’d have to go out into the weather.”

What’s warming his heart today is the shale gas revolution that technology has enabled. In fact, Tillerson is betting much of his company’s future growth — and a good portion of his legacy — on the promise of fracking. Two years ago Tillerson engineered a $35 billion acquisition of natural-gas producer XTO Energy in large part to buy the company’s hydraulic-fracturing expertise. It is easily the largest deal the energy giant has done since the $88 billion mega-merger with Mobil orchestrated by Tillerson’s predecessor, Lee Raymond, in 1999.

In buying XTO, the 60-year-old Tillerson has further reshaped the company. In 2011, Exxon reported sales of $486 billion — a gargantuan number that could vault it past Wal-Mart (WMT) to recapture the No. 1 position in this year’s Fortune 500. The $41 billion in profit it earned was the second-largest total in corporate history, behind only the $45 billion record that Exxon set in 2008. Those astronomical earnings have been driven by persistently high oil prices. But today Exxon, the prototypical oil giant, gets about 50% of its production from, and has 50% of its reserves in, natural gas. The company’s stock has risen 77% since Tillerson became CEO at the beginning of 2006, compared with 29% for the S&P 500 index (SPX). To deliver the future returns that its shareholders expect, Exxon needs the XTO purchase — which so far hasn’t lived up to its promise because of falling natural-gas prices — to pay off bigtime. Tillerson has good reason to believe it will.

Over the past several years fracking has unlocked a vast new source of energy supply in the U.S. Advanced forms of the process that Tillerson used in the 1970s, combined with innovative methods of drilling, have enabled energy companies to extract huge quantities of natural gas and oil trapped in shale rock — assets that were previously thought to be either impossible or uneconomic to produce. Production from large shale deposits, or “plays,” such as the Barnett in Texas, the Haynesville in East Texas and Louisiana, and the vast Marcellus in the Northeast, has surged.

Read the full article: Exxon’s big bet on shale gas

T. Boone Pickens Statement on President Obama’s State of the Union Address

“In his remarks in the State of the Union address, President Barack Obama again called for a national focus on developing a long-term energy plan for America. I agree we should use every available American resource. I applaud President Obama for highlighting natural gas and for calling on Congress to better promote its use.

“The expanded use of natural gas in America – in power generation and transportation – has enormous bipartisan support in the Congress and in the states. It is time to move from vague generalities to specifics on how we make this transition happen. I am confident that President Obama, as well as all the candidates for President, will lay out detailed plans on how they intend to achieve it.

“We cannot solve the OPEC dependency crisis without a focus on transportation. It is two-thirds of all oil use. Oil is not a major player in the production of electricity so creating more energy from natural gas, hydro, wind, solar or nuclear will not have a major impact on our dependence on OPEC for our oil. Finding a substitute for oil as a major transportation fuel will.

“We have massive amounts of natural gas reserves in the United States and we should immediately move to better utilize it. As a White House report on rebuilding our economy states, natural gas is the cleanest of the fossil fuels.

“America does not have a natural gas production problem – we are awash in natural gas. What we have is a demand problem and unless we bring both sides of the equation in balance, we will see this cleaner, cheaper, abundant, domestic resource exported in greater and greater quantities.

“I hope the President and the Congress will call on American ingenuity and creativity to utilize all of our domestic resources. America is blessed with having the cheapest energy in the world right now. It is that cheap energy – including coal, oil and natural gas – that will not only fuel our factories, cars, and trucks, but will fuel the resurgence of manufacturing in America, while creating solid, well-paying, and permanent jobs.”

Source: The Pickens’ Plan